Is the Pursuit of Global Rankings Hindering Quality Education in Indian Universities?

Indian universities are increasingly striving to secure higher positions in global rankings like the QS World University Rankings and Times Higher Education (THE) rankings. While these accolades bring prestige and international visibility, they also spark an important debate: Is the relentless focus on global rankings compromising the true quality of education delivered to students?

The Obsession with Global Rankings

In recent years, global rankings have become synonymous with institutional success. Universities across India are channeling substantial resources into boosting research output, recruiting international faculty, and establishing global collaborations. In fact, a 2023 report by the Ministry of Education highlighted that leading Indian universities collectively spent nearly 20% of their budgets on research-focused initiatives aimed at improving their global ranking positions.

While these efforts have increased visibility, there is a growing concern that the focus on rankings is diverting attention from essential aspects of education, such as quality teaching and holistic student development.

Quality vs. Rank: A Questionable Trade-off?

The emphasis on ranking metrics has led to a scenario where universities prioritize measurable outcomes like research publications and citation counts over student engagement and curriculum quality. According to the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), only 40% of Indian institutions reported improvements in teaching methodologies, even as they significantly increased spending on research activities. This data underscores the trade-off between aiming for high rankings and investing in enriching the student experience.

A 2022 study by the QS Intelligence Unit found that 60% of surveyed Indian universities admitted redirecting resources from student welfare initiatives to areas that influence ranking outcomes. This troubling trend indicates a growing gap between what institutions aim to achieve for global recognition and what students truly need for a meaningful education.

What Do Rankings Measure—and What Do They Miss?

Global ranking systems, such as the Times Higher Education rankings, place significant weight on research output, internationalization, and academic reputation. For example, only 30% of THE’s ranking criteria pertain to teaching quality, incorporating factors like the student-to-faculty ratio and doctorate productivity. This limited focus often overlooks essential elements like graduate employability and the relevance of academic programs to current industry demands.

According to a Brookings India report, the emphasis on metrics-driven outcomes overlooks key indicators of educational success, such as student well-being and social impact. Countries like Finland, whose universities rank lower on global scales, prioritize student welfare and holistic learning, demonstrating that quality education doesn’t always align with higher rankings.

Impact on Academic Culture

The race to climb the global rankings has reshaped academic culture, often in detrimental ways. Faculty members face immense pressure to publish research, creating a “publish-or-perish” environment where research quality can suffer. A study by the Observer Research Foundation (ORF) revealed that 45% of faculty reported a decline in research quality due to the relentless demand for more publications. This culture undermines academic integrity, as the focus shifts from meaningful research to producing a high volume of publications.

Furthermore, undergraduate teaching often takes a backseat. Resources that could be used to enhance the student experience are instead allocated to research and internationalization efforts. According to the QS Intelligence Unit, 70% of Indian undergraduates feel their education is compromised because institutions prioritize research achievements over effective teaching and mentorship.

Case Studies and Real-Life Examples

Several top Indian universities, such as the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and Delhi University, have heavily invested in research and global collaborations to boost their rankings. While these efforts have enhanced their global profiles, the impact on student-centered education remains mixed. On the other hand, universities like Ashoka University and Azim Premji University have focused on developing critical thinking and holistic learning experiences. Despite their lower global rankings, these institutions have gained a reputation for delivering well-rounded education that better equips students for the future.

Is There a Better Way Forward?

Education experts increasingly advocate for a more balanced approach that marries research excellence with high-quality teaching. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 presents a framework emphasizing holistic student development, multidisciplinary learning, and global collaboration. While the policy aims to enhance education quality in India, its success depends on a shift away from ranking-centric strategies.

Countries like Canada and Finland offer valuable lessons. Canadian universities, while not consistently ranked at the top, prioritize student satisfaction and comprehensive learning. Finland’s model, which focuses on student well-being and practical skills, produces graduates who excel globally, despite not topping international rankings.

The Role of Policy and Government Initiatives

The Indian government has implemented programs like the Study in India initiative and NEP 2020 to make Indian education globally competitive while maintaining a focus on student-centric values. A 2024 report by the Ministry of Education indicates that these programs have begun to make an impact. However, experts caution that an overemphasis on rankings could dilute the effectiveness of these reforms if not balanced with educational quality and inclusivity.

IME’s Vision for Global Education Accessibility in India

At India Market Entry (IME), our vision is to make quality global education accessible to all Indian students. We believe that while global rankings can provide useful benchmarks, true success lies in fostering an education system that empowers students with the skills and knowledge needed for a rapidly evolving world. IME supports initiatives that emphasize high teaching standards, impactful research, and holistic educational experiences.

Conclusion

While global rankings have brought attention to Indian higher education, they have also introduced significant challenges. The future of Indian education depends on striking a balance—where student outcomes, innovative teaching, and impactful research are valued over mere institutional prestige. At IME, we are committed to championing an education system that prioritizes student development and global readiness over ranking achievements.


References

  1. Ministry of Education
  2. ICRIER Studies
  3. QS Intelligence Unit
  4. Times Higher Education
  5. Brookings India
  6. Observer Research Foundation

India Market Entry (IME) is a boutique consulting firm specialising in assisting global education stakeholders to navigate India’s vibrant education sector. IME’s core competency is strategic business development.

Let's Get in Touch!

© 2024 India Market Entry. All rights reserved.

Trakru Global Services Private Limited that owns www.indiamarketentry.com, is a company incorporated under the laws of India, having its office at 588, Sector 14, Faridabad, Delhi NCR, Haryana, 121007, having CIN number U93000HR2020PTC087647